God's Revolution: Between the Sacred and the Profane

Preamble

God is a peculiar feature of our human civilization, which one day emerged from barbarism to the perplexity of a paradoxical existence between reason and faith, on the edge of the meaningless existential abyss; in a vertiginous career behind the divine that is in you; under the sign of a miracle born between sin and virtue, in eternal search for the brilliance of divinity overshadowed by the profanity of the animal instinct of his creation. God is man's quest that vacillates between the divine and his animal instinct.

Militarism in the Dock

The militarism of objective reason and materialism creates the impression of a distorted image from a concrete and absolute reality of nothingness, which can only be revealed by concrete and compulsive reasoning where there are no nuances, but the maximum possible objectivity, thus reaching the maximum of its potentiality to make itself believe in the power of its weapons, of material wealth, exploding in a certain civilizational supernova of technology and the aesthetic materialism of ugliness and then ending up spinning like a burnt boiler in the darkness of nothingness.

It is this exacerbated militarism that has given rise to the current modernity, from the first and second world wars combined, that is being questioned here, putting its generals in the dock.

God accuses!

What is at stake here is not only the objective reason of the Generals who create endless conflicts, pursuing this dialectic of war against each other, no matter who against whom, but what is at stake here is the existence of the sacred in struggle against the profane that created human civilization itself.

The concreteness of this militaristic

objectivity is what justifies wars, reducing the death of human beings to "accidents", as long as it is with the children of others and not of the generals themselves.

The reason for militarism justifies a certain aesthetics of ugliness that at night shines under the colorful spotlights of shopping centers, and by day reveals the concreteness of congested traffic in inhuman agglomerations. On the one hand, the hurried race for time that is worth money; on the other hand, the insignificance of human existence that can become a coincidence, now also in urban wars.

Post-1945 militarism is exhausted in the proliferation of wars in social conflicts that can no longer be resolved by the penal code, nor by churches domesticated by military interests that monotonously recite sacred verses to be confused with political slogans, since the profane is the military perspective that tries to destroy the sacred.

The sacred is the mystery of human civilization itself and resides in the nuances of divine knowledge that is born of sin that becomes the virtue of human existence.

The sacred is this human virtue in search of its inner divine radiance beyond its original sin.

The profane is the aesthetics of ugliness without nuances, without virtues, without brilliance, which confuses creature and creator in a war machine that kills the human spirit, and which neither shine in search of the divine within to become only the concreteness of the acceptance of sin without guilt, sex, drugs and rock-on-roll.

The aesthetics of ugliness strikes back

The justification of the profane is the creative revolution that kills and regenerates, without nuances in the linear reasoning that creates the wonders of technological civilization, but which imprisons and reduces human nature to the eternal dialectical discourse of some against the other, no matter who against whom, only to justify the creation and regeneration of the endless history of those who command against those who obey, since we live in a military age.

The class conflicts of those who can against those who can less, disappear within the hierarchical society of a military organization that rationalizes the question of social order as "PAX ROMANA", that is, an imposition of arms on the human spirit, which in turn leaves its search useless for the sacred, accepting its origin as a sinner without guilt.

As a result, social conflicts are exacerbated, prisons are overcrowded, and the penal code becomes the source of the militaristic morality that justifies the aesthetics of ugliness, and resolves spiritual conflict as a social conflict, confusing public morality with the morality existing within a penitentiary.

Mysticism is the justification of the militarism of dialectical discourse to achieve the historical materialism of the concreteness of objective reason, thus creating the aesthetics of modernism of ugliness, and the denial of God, driving material progress through the fabulous technological civilization in weapons.

This fabulous technological civilization of vibrant night lights, justifies the profane, disqualifies the divine, denying God and religions as dangerous to this human progress that transforms men into homosexuals and women into Generals.

This is the civilization of guiltless sin! Of the Leviathan in uniform, of continuous social progress where there is a so-called science capable of unraveling any mystery, solving any paradox, domesticating men at the whims of their generals, now also of generalas.

The Sacred, the Profane and Morality

Religions since the beginning of our civilization reflect the divine morality of virtue against sin, of the preacher against the sinner, of the sacred against the profane.

The present conflict of our civilization is situated precisely there, in the question of public morality, which has ceased to be the divine morality to be the morality of the penal code, and these two things are not the same.

Public morality

The question of public morality is the question that governs our behavior when we perceive in ourselves something very different from animals, and then the divine morality that governs our ethical and moral behavior arises, and the penal code that punishes the faults committed.

But a distinction must be made here between public morality which punishes according to the penal code, and divine morality which punishes sin. The first punishes the offender through punishment, the second the sinner through guilt, and these two may not be the same.

The problem today in the conceptualization of public morality lies in the substitution of the sacred, the guilt of the sinner, by the profane, the punishment of the offender, giving primacy to the penal code that punishes the offender, but leaves aside the sinner.

This is the dilemma of contemporary secular society, which has eliminated sin and guilt in its affront against the existence of God, morally reinforcing a guiltless civilization wrapped in sex, drugs and rock-on-roll, which only responds to a penal code that is venal in relation to religions and the divine.

Religions and paganism

The attempt to eliminate the sacred, consecrating the profane without guilt, was to co-opt religions, especially Christianity, of course, the basis of Western and Christian civilization.

Militarism has been imposing the penal code as the only source of public morality with the aim of obliterating religions and denying God, putting everything in a certain bottomless bag of guilty mysticism.

The Christian churches succumbed to the objective and scientific morality of the military barracks, maliciously abandoning the sacred for the social cause, confusing objective social conflict with spiritual conflict of the guilt of sin, accepting the discourse of dialectical militarism and historical materialism as inevitable, relegating God and Christ to a lesser position within the Church itself, which became a party of political causes, Therefore, of materialistic morality, without guilt, which follows the penal code.

By assuming that religious morality is the morality of social conflicts, the churches ceased to be sacred in search of the mystery of the divine that exists in our civilization to become a branch of public service, which monotonously recites verses of the Bible that are no longer sacred to be poetry of the religious past, and organizes fairs and bingos to draw lots for the sin of sinners without guilt.

Thus, the Christian churches ceased to have primacy in public morality, to find themselves surrounded by sin and the sinner, accepting the existence of this civilization based on guiltless sin, governed by the penal code.

Christian churches are in a deep crisis of morality by leaving aside the sacred and guilt in the teachings of Christ, who emerged precisely to rewrite the history of the sacred 2,000 years ago, denying pagan gods of dubious morality in favor of a single God of non-negotiable morality, of a Christian church open to all, when God became the God of all men, and not of pagan sects of Martian gods of immorality that justified powerful and corrupt rulers, who profanely claimed to be gods as well.

The Christian churches are dangerously close to the paganism of before Christ, since their morality is no longer based on the non-negotiable existence of the sacred (guilt), but on the acceptance of the profane (the offender's penalty), considering that abortion may not be a sin, freeing it from the guilt and punishment of the offender, and that homosexual marriage becomes a negotiation to make the church more modern.

In these circumstances, the litanies recited in churches today are relegated to a mystical past, since without the consecration of the sacred they cannot face the moral siege that the penal code frees sin from guilt, and sinners from punishment as an imposition of militarism and the current modernity of the aesthetics of ugliness and crime that has been legalized.

By Professor Ricardo Gomes Rodrigues

São Carlos, São Paulo, June 9, 2025

Link youtube

youtu.be

A Revolução de Deus: Entre o Sagrado e o Profano

Deus é uma característica peculiar da nossa civilização humana, que um dia emergiu da barbárie para a perplexidade de uma existência paradoxal entre a razão e a fé, a beira do abismo existencial sem sentido; em carrera vertiginosa atrás do divino que há em si; sob o signo de um milagre nascido entre o pecado e a virtude, em busca eterna pelo brilho da divindade ofuscada pela profanidade do instinto animal de sua criação. Deus é a busca do homem que vacila entre o divino e seu instinto animal. O Militarismo no Banco dos Réus O militarismo da razão objetiva e do materialismo cria a impressão de uma imagem distorcida a partir de uma realidade concreta e absoluta do nada, que só pode ser revelada pelo raciocínio concreto e compulsivo onde não existem nuances, mas a máxima objetividade possível, atingindo assim, o máximo de sua potencialidade de se fazer crer no poder de suas armas, da riqueza material, explodindo numa certa supernova civilizatória da tecnologia e do materialismo estético da feiura para logo em seguida terminar rodopiando como uma caldeira queimada na escuridão do nada. É esse militarismo exacerbado que fez emergir a atual modernidade, a partir da primeira e segunda guerra mundial combinadas que está sendo questionado aqui, colocando seus generais no banco dos réus. Deus acusa! O que está em jogo aqui não é apenas razão objetiva dos Generais que criam conflitos sem fim, perseguindo essa dialética da guerra de uns contra os outros, não importando de quem contra quem, mas o que está em jogo aqui é a existência do sagrado em luta contra o profano que criou a própria civilização humana. A concretude dessa objetividade militarista é o que justifica as guerras, reduzindo a morte de seres humanos a “casualidades”, desde que seja com os filhos dos outros e não dos próprios generais. A razão do militarismo justifica uma certa estética da feiura que de noite brilha sob refletores coloridos de centros comerciais, e de dia revela a concretude de trânsito congestionado das aglomerações inumanas. De um lado a corrida apressada pelo tempo que vale dinheiro; de outro a insignificância da existência humana que pode virar casualidade, agora também, em guerras urbanas.