China as a World Class Super Power

RICARDO GOMES RODRIGUES
16 de mar. de 2021
6 min de leitura

Communist China is not credible as a superpower. Never ever in history has any country reached this condition in less than 30 years, and it is precisely this dizzying growth which is the source of the economic crisis and the problems we are currently experiencing.

In 30 years, the Yankees of Boston, New York and Wall Street have flooded an immense amount of fiduciary money (Fiat Money) into Communist China, and by extension across all Asia in the hope of quickly turning them into a superpower, but the development of world power and influence does not happen that quickly, since it takes a long time to establish new relationships through which countries become the center of power, and develop civilization with its own characteristics.

This is not precisely the case with Communist China, which is more a variation of the Yankee colonialism and Imperialism from Boston, New York and Wall Street than really a center of its own power, or something that we could call the rise of a new world class superpower.

In just 30 years, communist China from very poor and modest backgrounds has obviously not developed a skilled staff that requires a superpower to manage its advanced processes such as for industries, commerce, finance and other sophisticated cultural and historical implications that require an intellectual critical mass that the Chinese communist regime does not have, except for these brutal and cruel relations, to which Tibet and the Central Asian Turkmen countries are subjected, showing how unprepared they are to establish sophisticated power relations, unless to show an ugly face without provoking any convincing.

Chinese Communist leaderships are crude political figures and their mistakes are everywhere, not only in Tibet or Central Asia, but also in the absence of their own cultural fabric that may offers anyone options of alliances, unless those imposed by this Chinese Communist elite who are tremendously unsure whether they really are or not a world class superpower.

No country is hastily recognized as a superpower due to dizzying economic growth, but little by little, through a slow recognition of its economic and cultural merits, and not as a brutal communist tyranny, reflected in sumptuous military parades and marches like well-choreographed toy lead soldiers.

The formation of a world class power is not done through military choreography, but through the process of seduction, albeit imperialist. There is no need to debate whether this is good or bad, but rather whether it is efficient or not on convincing others. No kind of imperialism is ultimately beneficial.

Now, cultural genocides such as those occurred in Tibet, through massive political campaigns of incarcerations; incapable of dialogue and recognition of any kind of limits, but merely imposing their points of view by shouting or through military marches is not a valid convincing process on the international arena.

What Communist China currently does with its neighbors is a harbinger of what it will do if its power is increased in the world. It is clear to all, that today's Chinese Communist leadership suffers an atrocious resentment for what the Anglo-Saxons did to them in the 19th century, and because of that appears as they are avid for revenge and retaliation against anyone, and this dizzying growth has just stimulated theirs crescent and latent passive-aggressive and hostile behavior, well revealed when they are contradicted. These are not instruments by which countries become a de facto center of world’s power, but a menacing caricature imposed by the neo-liberal Yankees from Boston and New York.

It is clear to everyone that the main feature of today's Chinese communist society is the restrained anger that always appears about to explode, and ready to settle accounts at the slightest provocation; and this may come from Tibet or the Turkic countries of central Asia. Then they show all their ugly face of a watch dog of the neo-liberal Yankees.

It is clear to all that these Chinese communist leadership are angry, totalitarian, and when they use certain diplomatic terms such as mutual respect or acceptance, they are not very convincing as their actions in other similar situation before, where the use of dialogue would be a demonstration of political skill never was used.

Chinese Communist leaders feel easily threatened by turning the political game into a farce, where they pretend to control their anger showing a friendly and diplomatic face, but waiting for the chance to prey and retaliate.

The case of Tibet and the countries of Central Asia show this intolerant character of the Chinese communist leadership, since they are not prepared to listen but to impose, and when questioned beyond certain measure, they explode in rampant violence, as in the case of the Central Asia Turkic peoples, when they imprisoned an entire population, dismantling a country and a culture through the massive transfer of ethnic Chinese population, with predatory intent and objectives of occupying the territory, imposing its culture through forced colonization. These facts demonstrate very well how incapacitated they are to play any superpower role in the International arena, even though their GDP has momentarily reached the same level as the United States.

The one to blame for this China superpower farce is undoubtedly the neo-liberal Yankees from Boston, New York and Wall Street, very capable of providing qualified personnel to develop the necessary financial and industrial processes in today's Communist China, but not for changing their typical dictatorial habits and vices of origin as a third world country. In a way, even with a GDP that is equal to that of Americans, they are still as poor as before. After all, no country becomes a world class superpower in less than 30 years.

The United States, in spite of its brutal Imperialism, has spent the last 150 years trying to developing strategies to "convince" people of their cultural merits, exercising a more subtle imperialism, through a much better trained workforce like that produced at the University of Harvard, which, we must recognize, play much better in this role as good imperialists than their new Chinese communist partners and allies. This demonstrates that takes time to learn how to become a superpower.

From this point of view, the present economic growth of Communist China is only virtuous, and does not qualified them for the exercise of a world class power; it may be just a temporary economic phenomenon. Besides, Communist China has not been able, in less than 30 years, to train and qualify necessary people for the subtleties of the 21st century international political power game, but only for the typical brutality and ignorance of 19th century British gunboat geopolitics.

The fault, I repeat, lies with the Yankee neoliberal elite of Boston, New York and Wall Street who seem to be in a hurry to impose Communist China as a superpower, albeit at the cost of the apparent decline of their Yankee Empire.

What this type of Yankee totally fails to understand is that the process of substituting one nation for another in the scenario of the world power game, does not change from democracy based on Tocqueville, as Democracy in America, full of merits; towards a Chinese communist dictatorship without any merits at all.

Why, after all, would anyone be interested in getting allied with a brutal Chinese dictatorship, for which, even the fact that they are really communists is questionable. This demonstrates China's farcical aspect for both as being communist or as a superpower.

These moral and ethical issues make all the difference as much as for the United States, which is notoriously perceived as a declining power, not exactly for economic reasons, but because their former convincing values of the wonders of Tocqueville’s democracy in America were exchanged for the Communist China political values, as they now consider them the new beacon of civilization.

This process generated a flood of moral and ethical contradictions that resulted in this inexorable decline and moral dejection, as it became clear to everyone that the Americans abandoned their own merits on the merits of their former enemies, now allies, the Chinese Communists.

These questions of political, moral and ethical order firmly contribute to the rise and fall of civilizations and superpowers on the world political scene, and not just virtuous economic growth as it is for this presented case of Communist China as a superpower.

The conclusion is that China's economic development is not credible either as a communist or even as a superpower, just as the same the strategies of the Yankees of Boston, New York and Wall Street are not credible of imposing on us this idea that there is a new Communist China superpower, through of a massive media campaign of the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times and CNN- CIA, and here in Brazil the journalistic complex Estadao, Folha and Globo.